Robert Margin v. Sea-Land Services, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
CLARK, Chief Judge:
A suit under 33 U.S.C. § 905(b) for injuries sustained by a welder while he was working on a dock was dismissed by the district court at the conclusion of the plaintiff’s case on the ground that the court lacked subject matter jurisdiction. Finding that no maritime jurisdiction over the plaintiff’s claims under the Admiralty Extension Act, 46 U.S.C. § 740, was properly alleged, we affirm.
I
Robert Margin was employed as a welder/fitter by the Boland Marine and Manufacturing Corporation, which does ship repair work in the New Orleans area. On July 5, 1983, he was assigned to…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Executive Jet Aviation, Inc. v. City of ClevelandSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Gutierrez v. Waterman Steamship Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Victory Carriers, Inc. v. LawSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Victory Carriers, Inc. v. LawSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Barbara HILDEBRAND and Husband, Jack Robert Hildebrand, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. HONEYWELL, INC., Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Jerome B. Grubart, Inc. v. Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Dahlen v. Gulf Crews, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2002
- Curtis Michael Richendollar, Cross-Appellant v. Diamond M Drilling Company, Inc., Cross-Appellee and Baker Shipyards, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1987
- Scott v. Trump Indiana, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
- Adamson v. Port of BellinghamCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.