Legal Opinion

Jones v. Jones

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided June 26, 1933No. 2266PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By BARNES. J.

It is the claim of plaintiff Clarence M. Jones that Laura E. Hanna (nee Jones) held a defeasible fee in the premises, subject to be divested on condition that she die without issue, and that having died without issue the fee now vests by executory devise to the plaintiff Clarence M. Jones and Ellis O. Jones II, share and share alike.

Defendants contend that the said Laura E. Hanna (nee Jones) held a fee simple title to the premises at the time of her death, and having devised such premises to the defendants, the plaintiff has no interest therein.

The case is submitted on an…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Colby v. . DotyNew York Court of Appeals · 1899
  2. O'Malley v. O'malley, Jr.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1925

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Margolis v. PaganoClermont County Court of Common Pleas · 1986
  2. Kidd v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API