Legal Opinion

Wiese & Hanley v. City of Cincinnati

Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Hamilton County

Decided November 15, 1913Published

1Opinion of the CourtG-eoghegan, J.

This was an action to recover from the city of Cincinnati the sum of $1,172.25, being1' a retained ten pereentum of the amount found to be due under a certain contract entered into between the plaintiffs and the defendant, the city of Cincinnati.

Counsel for both parties have agreed upon all matters, including the amount to be paid to plaintiffs in case the courts determine in their favor the single issue presented by counsel and hereinafter noted.

On the 4th day of October, 1904, the plaintiffs submitted a. certain bid for a street improvement in the city of Cincinnati, *482known as the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. McGonigale v. City of DefianceU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern Ohio · 1905

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API