Cameron J. Rose v. State

Cameron Rose appeals his conviction for attempted burglary. He raises three issues on appeal, only one of which merits discussion. Rose argues that the trial court erred in denying his motion for mistrial after his status as a probationer was admitted into evidence, despite an order granting a motion in limine prohibiting admission of that evidence. We affirm.

Rose represented himself at trial. The victim owns the Palms Hotel, where Rose resided when a dispute over toiletry items ensued. The victim testified that Rose, while threatening to kill him, attempted to break into the hotel’s locked…