Legal Opinion

Armstrong v. State ex rel. Oklahoma Insurance Department

Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided December 20, 2011No. 109,357PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

KEITH RAPP, Judge.

T1 The trial court plaintiff, David Armstrong (Armstrong), appeals an order granting summary judgment to the defendant, the State of Oklahoma ex rel. Oklahoma Insurance Department (State)1 This appeal proceeds under the accelerated appeal procedure of Okla. Sup.Ct. Rule 1.36, 12 O.S.Supp.2010, ch.15, app. 1.

BACKGROUND

1 2 In light of the issues presented in the summary judgment proceedings, the facts relating to Armstrong's discrimination claim do not need elaboration. The Oklahoma Insurance Department (OID) employed Armstrong as an unclassified employee. On January 6, 2006,…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Oncale v. Sundowner Offshore Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1998
  2. Burk v. K-Mart Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
  3. Perry v. WoodwardCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
  4. Kenneth J. Notari v. Denver Water DepartmentCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
  5. Vasek v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2008

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Armstrong v. STATE EX REL. OKLAHOMA INS.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API