Beck v. State
Alabama Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtSamford, J.
The evidence in this case discloses a state of fapts from which the jury was authorized to draw inference of guilt, and while the officers found only two or three teaspoonfuls of whisky, there was evidence which, if believed beyond a reasonable doubt, tended to prove a larger quantity. However, under our decisions the quantity is immaterial. The general charge was properly refused.
Refused charge 2 is covered by the oral charge.
The evidence 'being in conflict and giving to the conclusions of the court the weight to which they are entitled, we cannot say there was error in overruling the motion…
2Cited by2 opinions
- Henson v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1932
- Shaw v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1936