Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Commerce Union Bank v. Kinkade

Kentucky Supreme Court

Decided May 28, 1976Published

1ConcurrenceStephenson, Justice

I agree with the result in this case; however, I disagree with the manner in which this mineral deed is distinguished from the “broad form” mineral deeds.

This disagreement is based on an analysis of the authorities cited in Buchanan v. Watson, Ky., 290 S.W.2d 40 (1956). Here, as in Buchanan, the only feasible and economical method to mine the coal is by strip mining. Buchanan, in holding that the possessor of the mineral deed had the right to mine the coal by the method of strip mining, stated that “[t]he doctrine of stare decisis requires that we do not depart from the established rule.” A…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Buchanan v. WatsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1956
  2. McIntire v. Marian Coal Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1921
  3. Wiser Oil Company v. ConleyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1960
  4. Martin v. Kentucky Oak Mining CompanyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1968
  5. Case v. Elk Horn Coal CorporationCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1925

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API