Legal Opinion

In re Horney

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided May 13, 1947No. 5240PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGarrett, Presiding Judge

All four of the claims, Nos. 1, 3, 4 and 5, in appellant’s application for a patent relating to a process for the production of cyclopropane-were rejected by the Primary Examiner of the United States Patent Office and the examiner’s decision was affirmed by the Board of Appeals. From the board’s decision appellant appeals here.

Claim 1 is a generic claim and reads as follows:

1. The method of making hydrocarbons-, having the general formula OnH2n-which includes the steps of treating a substituted alkane containing three or more carbon atoms and two different halogens selected from the group…

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. Application of LindbergCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1952
  2. In Re KaufmannCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1951
  3. Application of Philip S. Fay and Fred J. FoxCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1965
  4. Application of KamletCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1950
  5. Application of Ralph N. LulekCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1962

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API