Legal Opinion

Yanito v. Barber

District Court, D. Utah

Decided September 20, 1972No. Civ. C 220-72PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

WILLIAM E. DOYLE, Circuit Judge.

In this action plaintiffs, Navajo Indians, seek recovery for alleged violation of their civil rights. They have invoked 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 and 1343(3) and 42 U.S.C. § 1983.

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 2281 and 2284 et seq. a three-judge district court has been convened. The matter has been heard, including the presentation of evidence, and the cause now stands submitted.

The plaintiffs reside at Bluff, Utah in San Juan County. About two weeks before the May 10 deadline for filing as independent candidates, plaintiffs sought the aid of one…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Yick Wo v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Dombrowski v. PfisterSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. Snowden v. HughesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  4. Zwickler v. KootaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. Worcester v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1832

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Reform Party of Alabama v. BennettDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 1998
  2. United States v. Blaine CountyDistrict Court, D. Montana · 2001
  3. Navajo Nation v. San Juan CountyDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2016
  4. United States v. Blaine County, MontanaDistrict Court, D. Montana · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API