Legal Opinion

Yarbrough v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided April 20, 1927No. 10718Published

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING.

HAWKINS, Judge. —

Appellant insists that we should hold under the facts that possession of the stolen animals was' improperly alleged in the true owner Bobbitt. We have again reviewed the evidence and believe it to be fairly stated in our original opinion. Among other authorities to which we are referred by appellant as supporting his contention are Bailey v. State, 20 Tex. Crim. Rep. 68; Honea v. State, 56 Tex. Crim. Rep. 278, 119 S. W. 851; Bonner v. State, 58 Tex. Crim. Rep. 195, 125 S. W. 22; McKnight v. State, 70 Tex. Crim. Rep. 470, 156 S. W. 1188. All of these…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hartman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1919
  2. McKnight and Elmore v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1913
  3. Honea, Alias Watson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1909
  4. Bonner v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1910
  5. Rabe v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1919

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API