Legal Opinion

Parra v. Neal

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided June 23, 2010No. 09-1404PublishedCited by 50 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROVNER, Circuit Judge.

The plaintiffs, all registered voters in the Chicago Municipal Consolidated Primary Election on February 27, 2007, sued the Board of Election Commissioners for the City of Chicago and its members under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, claiming that the defendants invalidated their votes in violation of their rights under the Fourteenth Amendment. The district court granted summary judgment for the defendants. We affirm the judgment.

At summary judgment, the plaintiffs filed an opposition to the defendants’ motion but did not bother to respond to their statement of material facts. See…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Michael B. Smith v. Douglas Lamz and the Village of Algonquin, a Municipal CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
  2. Cracco v. Vitran Express, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
  3. Gunville v. WalkerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
  4. Delgado v. Board of Election CommissionersIllinois Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Kozuszek v. BrewerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by50 opinions

  1. Bryan v. FawkesSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2014
  2. Zegarra v. John Crane, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2016
  3. Henderson v. Bovis Lend Lease, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2012
  4. Sherman v. Indian Trails Public Library DistrictAppellate Court of Illinois · 2012
  5. Parra v. NealCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API