Legal Opinion

Greer v. Stanislau

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided November 20, 1953No. 14400PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GANEY, District Judge.

This matter is before the court on defendant’s motion to dismiss under Rule 8(c), Fed.Rules Civ.Proc. 28 U.S.C. raising the defense of res judicata.

On December 22, 1950, the automobiles owned and driven by the respective parties to this action collided on the streets of Philadelphia. As a result of the collision a flag pole, fence and porch on the property of Albert C. Schleith and his wife were damaged. The latter brought suit against both parties as joint tortfeasors in the Municipal Court of Philadelphia County1 seeking damages in the amount of $128. Greer and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Simodejka v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
  2. Hornstein v. Kramer Bros. Freight Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1943

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Barbara E. Kimmel, Administratrix of the Estate of Frank C. Kimmel, Deceased v. Yankee Lines, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1955
  2. Creighton v. RuarkCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1962
  3. Chikotas v. American Buslines, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1960
  4. Barbara E. Kimmel, Administratrix of the Estate of Frank C. Kimmel, Deceased v. Yankee Lines, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1955
  5. R. D. Wood Company v. Phoenix Steel CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1964

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API