Legal Opinion

JAN BURGESS, and all 2,959 individuals identified in the Burgess FTCA Administrative Complaint v. United States

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided January 28, 2025No. 4:17-cv-11218Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION In re FTCA Flint Water Cases, Case No. 17-cv-11218 _________________________/ (Consolidated) This Order Relates to: All Cases Honorable Linda V. Parker ________________________________/ OPINION AND ORDER DENYING THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA’S MOTION TO DISMISS FOR LACK OF SUBJECT-MATTER JURISDICTION PURSUANT TO THE FEDERAL TORT CLAIMS ACT’S DISCRETIONARY FUNCTION EXCEPTION Earlier in this litigation, the United States of America (hereafter “Government”) filed a motion to dismiss, arguing that the Federal Tort Claim…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. United States v. GaubertSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Berkovitz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. United States v. S.A. Empresa De Viacao Aerea Rio GrandenseSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. The Ohio National Life Insurance Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API