Legal Opinion

Dean v. Griffith

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 10, 1952No. 6 Div. 334PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOSTER, Justice.

This suit comes here on appeal by complainant, who was cross-respondent' in a cross-bill, from a decree overruling demurrer to the cross-bill.

The chief controversy is whether the complainant has lost her right to redeem certain property under mortgage by virtue of the terms of the deed to the mortgagee containing a right to redeem.

The land was owned by the husband of complainant at the time of his death. He left the widow and two sons as his sole heirs at law. The widow claimed 'homestead and dower rights. She and one son Lewis Dean at different times executed two mortgages on…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Stoutz v. RouseSupreme Court of Alabama · 1887
  2. Peagler v. StablerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
  3. Lamar v. Lincoln Reserve Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1930
  4. Sloss-Sheffield S. & I. Co. v. LollarSupreme Court of Alabama · 1910
  5. Goree v. ClementsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1891

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Nearhos v. City of MobileSupreme Court of Alabama · 1952
  2. Morgan Plan Company v. BruceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1957
  3. Morgan Plan Company v. BruceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1955
  4. Adams v. Mathieson Alabama Chemical CorporationSupreme Court of Alabama · 1954
  5. Young v. BlonkSupreme Court of Alabama · 1954

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API