Legal Opinion

Friends of the River v. United States Army Corps of Engineers

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided August 8, 2025No. Civil Action No. 2016-2327Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA FRIENDS OF THE RIVER, Plaintiff, v. No. 16-cv-2327-ZMF UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Plaintiff, Friends of the River (“FOR”), has requested attorneys’ fees for its successful litigation in a nine-year-long Freedom of Information Act (“FOIA”) dispute with Defendant United States Army Corps of Engineers (“Corps”). See Mem. Supp. Pl.’s Mot. Award Att’ys’ Fees & Costs (“Pl.’s Mot.”) 1–2, ECF No. 106-1; 5 U.S.C. § 552(a)(4)(E)(i). The Court concludes that FOR is eligible for a fee…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Robert G. Vaughn v. Bernard Rosen, Executive Director, United States Civil Service CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973
  4. Fox v. ViceSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  5. Department of the Interior v. Klamath Water Users Protective Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 2001

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API