Legal Opinion

Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

Texas Attorney General Reports

Decided July 2, 1992No. DM-166Published

1Opinion of the Court

QBffice of the 2lttornep Qkneral &ate of Qkxae DAN MORALES September 21,1992 ATTORNEY GENERAL Honorable John Vance Opinion No. DM-166 CXminal District Attorney Dallas County Re: Whether charges for uncertified 133 North Industrial Boulevard copies of records of judiciary in district LB 19 clerk’s office are set by section 9(d) of Dallas, Texas 752074313 article 6252-17a, V.T.C.S. (RQ-183) Dear Mr. Vance: You request advice as to the costs that may be charged by the Dallas County District Clerk for copies of documents in his office. In particular, you ask whether section 9(d) of the Open…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Nixon v. Warner Communications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Ashpole v. Millard, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1989
  3. Times Herald Printing Co. v. JonesTexas Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Palacios v. CorbettCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915
  5. Mustard v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1986

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API