Legal Opinion

Mitchell Co. v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided April 10, 1920No. 2020PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from Board of United States General Appraisers, G. A. 8297 (T. D. 38175).. [Oral argument Mar. 26, 1920, by Mr. Tompkins and Mr. Edelbertz.)

1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, Presiding Judge

Paragraph 170 of the act of 1913 reads as follows:

170. Paving posts, railroad ties, and telephone, trolley, electric-light, and telegraph poles of. cedar or other noods, 10 per centum ad valorem.

In the free list there is a provision, paragraph 647, for “logs, timber, round, unmanufactured, hewn or sawed, sided or squared”; and for “sawed boards, planks, deals, and other lumber, not further manufactured than sawed, planed, and tongued and grooved,” not specially provided for.

There were imported at the port of Seattle, and free entry asked, various kinds of lumber and timber. There were many…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. United States v. BaxterCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1919

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. Dixie Veneer Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API