Bowdoin v. State
Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
Max Bowdoin appeals from the trial court's judgment in favor of the State of Alabama; the Retirement Systems of Alabama ("the RSA"); former Governor Don E. Siegelman; and David G. Bronner, executive secretary of the RSA (hereinafter collectively referred to as "the defendants"). We dismiss the appeal.
Bowdoin filed a complaint for declaratory relief against the defendants that alleged, in pertinent part, that "Article VI[,] Clause 2 of the United States Constitution, commonly referred to as `The Supremacy Clause' provides that Federal Law supercedes State Law and therefore, [§] 36-27-4(d),…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Wallace v. TEE JAYS MFG. CO., INC.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1997
- Board of Trustees of Employees' Retirement System v. TalleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1973
- Ex Parte St. Vincent's Hosp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1994
- Bratton v. City of FlorenceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1996
- Busch Jewelry Company v. City of BessemerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1957
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Atheer Wireless, LLC v. State Department of RevenueCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2017
- Ex Parte StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 2006
- Ex Parte StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 2006