Legal Opinion
In re G.E.T.
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided July 15, 1988No. CA 88 1083PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LeBLANC, Judge.
The issue presented in this adoption proceeding is whether plaintiffs, Mr. and Mrs. GET, sustained their burden of proving it was in the best interest of the child they sought to adopt to permit the adoption.1 The trial court concluded they did not do so and dismissed their petition for adoption. Plaintiffs now appeal this judgment.
EJG, the child sought to be adopted, was born on March 1, 1985, of the legal union between Richard and Dana G., the child’s natural father and mother, respectively. On February 17, 1987, Richard and Dana consented to the adoption of EJG by…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Smith v. Livingston Parish Police JuryLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1982
- In Re Adoption of BroussardLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1985
- In Re EWBLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1983
- In Re NortonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1985
3Cited by7 opinions
- Touzet v. VSM Seafood Services, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1996
- Duplessis Cadillac, Inc. v. Creative CreditLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1992
- Recovery Development Group, LLC v. National Baptist Convention of America, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2011
- Caceras v. WorkLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2013
- Salt Domes, Inc. v. Villere Food Group, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2003
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.