Legal Opinion
In re Snyder
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Decided June 30, 1977No. Patent Appeal No. 76-669PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
LANE, Judge.
Petitioner requests the vacating of our mandate in Patent Appeal No. 76-669, involving application serial No. 332,021, filed February 12, 1973, for “Permanently Flexible Bituminous Tape.” The petition is granted.
Background
In Patent Appeal No. 76-669, we affirmed the decision of the Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) Board of Appeals in an unpublished opinion dated April 21, 1977. The involved application contained no allowed claims, and our mandate issued on May 13,1977. Petitioner asserts by way of affidavit that good cause exists for vacating the mandate, essentially for these…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Co. Of New York, Defendant-Third Party v. Marine Mart, Inc., Third PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970
- National Labor Relations Board v. Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America, Afl-Cio, Local 990Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
- Follette v. BurgosSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Greater Boston Television Corporation v. Federal Communications Commission, Whdh, Inc., a Massachusetts Corporation, Intervenor. Whdh, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission, Greater Boston Television Corporation, a Massachusetts Corporation, Intervenor. Charles River Civic Television, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission, Whdh, Inc., Boston Broadcasters Inc., Intervenors. Whdh, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission, Boston Broadcasters, Inc., Intervenor. Greater Boston Tv Co., Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission, Whdh, Inc., Boston Broadcasters Inc., IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1971
- Corrected Opinion United States of America v. Lewis Miller Smyth, III and Glenn B. BavousettCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Mars, Inc. v. Coin Acceptors, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009