Legal Opinion
Du Pont v. Du Pont
Superior Court of Delaware
Decided July 16, 1951PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
83 A.2d 105 (1951)
DU PONT
v.
DU PONT.
Superior Court of Delaware, New Castle.
July 16, 1951.
Arthur G. Logan (of Logan, Marvel and Boggs) and Stephen E. Hamilton, Jr., all of Wilmington, for plaintiff.
James R. Morford, William H. Bennethum and Edward W. Cooch, Jr. (of Morford, Bennethum Marvel & Cooch), all of Wilmington, for defendant.
HERRMANN, Judge.
On December 7, 1950, the plaintiff filed a petition for the annulment of his marriage with the defendant, alleging that, by reason of an invalid divorce, the defendant had a husband living at the time of her marriage to the plaintiff. By amendment to…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Higgins v. . SharpNew York Court of Appeals · 1900
- Hunt v. HuntSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
- Willits v. WillitsNebraska Supreme Court · 1906
- State ex rel. Wooten v. District CourtMontana Supreme Court · 1920
- Brown v. BrownSuperior Court of Delaware · 1942
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- du Pont v. du PontSuperior Court of Delaware · 1952
- duPont v. duPontSupreme Court of Delaware · 1952
- Du Pont v. Du PontSupreme Court of Delaware · 1952