Legal Opinion

Brewin v. Commissioner

United States Tax Court

Decided September 12, 1979No. Docket No. 1887-74Published

Venue for appeal of Tax Court cases lies in the judicial district in which the taxpayer resides. Sec. 7482, I.R.C. 1954. Held, for purposes of sec. 7482 the term residence means domicile. Held, further, expenditures incurred while taxpayer is on home leave are not deductible under sec. 162.

1Opinion of the Court

Roger C. Brewin and Mary T. Brewin, Petitioners v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Respondent

Brewin v. Commissioner

Docket No. 1887-74

United States Tax Court

72 T.C. 1055; 1979 U.S. Tax Ct. LEXIS 62;

September 12, 1979, Filed

Decision will be entered for the respondent.

Venue for appeal of Tax Court cases lies in the judicial district in which the taxpayer resides. Sec. 7482, I.R.C. 1954. Held, for purposes of sec. 7482 the term residence means domicile. Held, further, expenditures incurred while taxpayer is on home leave are not deductible under sec. 162.

Roger C. Brewin, pro se.

Charles S.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. TEXAS v. FLORIDA Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
  2. Golsen v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1970
  3. Brewin v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1979
  4. Bruce Cornwall and Louise B. Stratton v. Commissioner Internal Revenue ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1971
  5. Stratton v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1969

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API