Legal Opinion

Warnick v. Booher

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided September 22, 2005No. 02-5201Published

1Opinion of the Court

425 F.3d 842

Anthony H. WARNICK, Petitioner-Appellant,

v.

Glynn BOOHER, Warden, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 02-5201.

United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.

September 22, 2005.

Philip J. Weiser, University of Colorado School of Law, Boulder, CO, for the Petitioner-Appellant.

William R. Holmes, Assistant Attorney General (W.A. Drew Edmondson, Attorney General, with him on the brief), Oklahoma City, OK, for Respondent-Appellee.

Before SEYMOUR, Circuit Judge, PORFILIO, Senior Circuit Judge, and HARTZ, Circuit Judge.

HARTZ, Circuit Judge.

1

Anthony Warnick appeals the district court's denial of his…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Slack v. McDanielSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Benton v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Wilkinson v. DotsonSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  4. Auer v. RobbinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  5. Bowen v. Georgetown University HospitalSupreme Court of the United States · 1988

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API