Legal Opinion

Peoria Life Ins. v. Haenelt

District Court, S.D. Texas

Decided December 31, 1930No. 395PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUTCHESON, District Judge''

This is an action by the insurer to cancel for false representations made in the application for insurance two policies each for the sum of $5,000, issued under date of April 16, 1929, upon the life of Roy Robert Haenelt, now deceased. The assured died shortly after (jho policies were written; the assigned cause of death being heart failure.

It is claimed that the assured, under the statement, “I hereby declare the following statements and answers to be true without evasion or concealment,” answered falsely with respect to his having previously applied and been…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Mutual Life Insurance Co. of New York v. Hilton-GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  2. Mutual Life Ins. Co. of New York v. Hurni Packing Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1919
  3. New York Life Ins. Co. v. McCarthyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1927
  4. Adler v. New York Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1929
  5. Keeton v. Jefferson Standard Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1925

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Warren v. New York Life Ins.District Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1941
  2. William T. Schor v. Commodity Futures Trading Commission, Conticommodity Services, Inc. And Richard L. Sandor, Mortgage Services of America v. Commodity Futures Trading Commission, Conticommodity Services, Inc. And Richard L. SandorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API