Legal Opinion

Watts v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided July 5, 1983No. 82-533PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Before a defendant in a criminal proceeding will be permitted to act as his own counsel, the trial court shall make an inquiry on the record to demonstrate that the defendant fully understands and appreciates the seriousness of the charges and is capable of representing himself. The test as laid down by the U.S. Supreme Court reads as follows:

“To discharge this duty properly in light of the strong presumption against waiver of the constitutional right to counsel, a judge must investigate as long and as thoroughly as the circumstances of the case before him demand. The fact that an accused may…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Von Moltke v. GilliesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  2. Mitchell v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
  3. Robinson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1979
  4. Drago v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
  5. McClain v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1977

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Schafer v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
  2. Felton v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API