Faribault v. Sater
Supreme Court of Minnesota
This action was commenced in the District Court for Nice county, by Alexander Faribault against Isaac N. Sater and James H. Bangs.
Read the full summary
This action was commenced in the District Court for Nice county, by Alexander Faribault against Isaac N. Sater and James H. Bangs. The complaint sets out four distinct causes of action : the first, for the principal and interest alleged to be due upon a promissory note, executed on the 22d day of August, 1865, by defendants to one Henry Melhorn, and by said Melhorn indorsed to the plaintiff; the other three for the annual interest alleged to be due the plaintiff on three several promissory notes, executed by the defendants to the plaintiff on the 27th day of July, 1865. The defendants in…
1Opinion of the CourtMcMillan, J.
By the Go-mi The bill of exceptions in this case states that there was conflicting testimony as to the representations made by plaintiff at the purchase ; as to the truth of the representations; as to whether the sluice-way or any part of it was placed upon the sand rock, and as to the capacity of the mill at the time of the purchase, and as to the damages resulting from the misrepresentations. The defendants testify that the mill would grind but about eight bushels per hour after they had purchased of Faribault, but they were of opfinion that it was owing to back water, until they made a…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Steadman v. GuthrieCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1862
3Cited by6 opinions
- Conant v. National State BankIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
- Hawley v. WallaceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1917
- Pratt v. Pioneer Press Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1884
- Redding v. WrightSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
- Wilder v. DeCouSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1872
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.