Reynolds v. Commonwealth
Court of Appeals of Virginia
1Opinion of the Court
MOON, Chief Judge.
Martin J. Reynolds appeals his conviction for assault and battery. Reynolds argues that the trial court erred in permitting the Commonwealth to introduce evidence of Reynolds’ alleged other bad acts unrelated to the charge for which he was tried. Finding the probative value of the other bad acts evidence outweighed its prejudicial effect, and because the evidence was probative of Reynolds’ motive and intent and was sufficiently related in time and place to the act for which Reynolds was convicted, we affirm.
The victim, Hal Taylor, testified that on May 6, 1995, he went to…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Sutphin v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1985
- Satcher v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1992
- Lewis v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1983
- Hawks v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1984
- Williams v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1962
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Utz v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1998
- Commonwealth v. WilliamsNorfolk County Circuit Court · 1998
- James Carroll Durrette v. Commonwealth of VirginiaCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2020
- John David Smith v. Commonwealth of VirginiaCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1998
- Kevin Lamont Lambert v. Commonwealth of VirginiaCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2019
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.