Legal Opinion

Roberts v. . Chittenden

New York Court of Appeals

Decided February 7, 1882PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Court, in the first judicial department, entered upon an order made March 11, 1881, which affirmed a judgment in favor of defendants, entered upon a verdict directed by the court. (It is reported upon a former appeal sub nom. Robinson v. Chittenden, 69 N. Y. 525.) The nature of the action and the material facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtDanforth, J.

This action was commenced by Henry E. Robinson, as plaintiff, and he dying, it was revived and continued in the name of the above appellants, his executors. The complaint stated that on the 23d day of June, 1865, the defendants were the owners of the ship Great Republic, lying at the port of San Francisco; that the plaintiff entered into an agreement with its master, by which it was mutually understood he would convey a certain trunk from that port to the city of Hew York, and there deliver it to the plaintiff, or to Wells, Fargo & Co.; that it has never been delivered to either “ by reason…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Fleming v. SlocumNew York Supreme Court · 1820
  2. Robinson v. . ChittendenNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
  3. The FalconU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1853

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. The DrewDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1883
  2. Glazer v. Old Dominion Steamship Co.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1909
  3. Einstein v. Clyde Steamship Co.New York Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Taber v. Board of SupervisorsNew York Supreme Court · 1891

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API