Legal Opinion

New York Credit Men's Adjustment Bureau, Inc. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided June 30, 1970No. R.D. 11715; Entry Nos. M 1271A, etcPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Rao, Chief Judge:

The merchandise involved in these appeals for reappraisement, consolidated at the trial, consists of men’s and boys’ cotton sport shirts manufactured in Jamaica, British West Indies, by Eton Mills, Ltd., and exported to the United States during 1961 through 1966 through the port of Miami, Florida.

The merchandise was appraised on the basis of constructed value, as that value is defined in section 402(d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956. The appraise-ments were based on the invoice unit values per dozen plus the sum of $1.00 per…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. C. J. Tower & Sons of Buffalo, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967
  2. Globe Shipping Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969
  3. Schmidt v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967
  4. C. J. Tower & Sons of Niagara, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1968
  5. John V. Carr & Son, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1963

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Brown, Alcantar & Brown, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1972
  2. Brown, Alcantar & Brown, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1972
  3. VWP of America, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2001
  4. Ampex Professional Products Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1972
  5. Brown, Alcantar & Brown, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1972

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API