Arabie v. CITGO Petroleum Corp.
Supreme Court of Louisiana
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partKnoll, J.
|TI concur with the portion of the majority opinion affirming the trial court’s award of compensatory damages. Plaintiffs unquestionably suffered compensable injuries *325as a direct result of exposure to noxious chemicals released during the environmental disaster caused by Citgo’s grossly negligent acts.
With all due respect, I strongly dissent from the portion of the majority opinion reversing the trial court’s award of punitive damages under Texas and Oklahoma law. Under the conflicts of laws principles set forth in our Civil Code, punitive damages may be awarded in tort cases where the law of…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Rosell v. EscoSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1989
- Sistler v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1990
- Copenhaver v. John Bonura & Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1925
- Patricia Thomas v. Capital Security Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1988
- Mobil Oil Corp. v. EllenderTexas Supreme Court · 1998
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.