Legal Opinion
Anderson v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided June 11, 1991No. A91A0186PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Beasley, Judge.
Defendant was convicted of selling cocaine, OCGA § 16-13-30, and enumerates nine rulings as error.
1. The first enumeration is the court’s permitting the prosecutor to remain in the courtroom after witnesses were sequestered.
The ruling did not contravene OCGA § 24-9-61. “The prosecutor may testify as a witness after other witnesses for the State have testified.” Chastain v. State, 255 Ga. 723, 725 (2) (342 SE2d 678) (1986); Blalock v. State, 250 Ga. 441 (1) (298 SE2d 477) (1983); Davis v. State, 242 Ga. 901, 903 (3) (252 SE2d 443) (1979).
2. Error is asserted in the court’s…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Driggers v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1979
- Davis v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1979
- Stevens v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1978
- Orkin v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1976
- Mitchell v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1976
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- People v. StanawayMichigan Supreme Court · 1994
- Ellison v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2000
- Lebis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1994
- Pettis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1996
- People v. StanawayMichigan Supreme Court · 1994