Legal Opinion · Concurrence

AKA v. Jefferson Hosp. Ass'n, Inc.

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided May 10, 2001No. 99-1366Published

1ConcurrenceAnnabelle Clinton Imber, Justice

I concur result reached by the majority in this matter. However, I do not agree with the analysis in Part I of the majority opinion.

The majority correctly suggests that consistency should be the benchmark when this court deals with legislative intent; however, the opinion falls short of its goal in its misplaced rebanee on the amended definition of person in the homicide statutes at Ark. Code Ann. § 5-1-102 (Supp. 1999).1 This statute provides no basis for a retroactive application of a broadened definition of personhood to the instant case.

Arkansas Code Annotated § 5-1-102 was passed as Act…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pa. v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. Harper v. Virginia Department of TaxationSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. Rivers v. Roadway Express, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
  5. In Re RahrerSupreme Court of the United States · 1891

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API