Legal Opinion

State v. Velasquez

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided August 11, 2004No. 3D02-2756PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING GRANTED

2Per curiam

The State appeals the trial court’s order reducing a charge of trafficking in cannabis to a charge of possession of cannabis. We reverse. In his motion for rehearing, the appellee, Jorge Velasquez, raises, for the first time, the sole issue of whether an appellate court has jurisdiction to review a trial court’s order reducing a criminal charge. See State v. Richars, 792 So.2d 570 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001). We have ruled that we do have jurisdiction in such cases. State v. Exposito, 854 So.2d 674 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003). We therefore grant the appellee’s motion for…

3Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Taylor v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002
  2. Cronin v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
  3. Wright v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004
  4. State v. RicharsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001
  5. State v. CastroDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. EstradaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API