Brandon Printing Co. v. Bostick
Supreme Court of Alabama
Appeal from Circuit Court of Jackson. Tried before the Hon. J. A. Bilrro. This was a statutory trial of the right of property between F. A. Bostick, as plaintiff, and the Brandon Printing Company as claimant; and was instituted ixi the following manner: F. A. Bostick commenced a suit by attachment against J. W. Shoemaker, Lisle Shoemaker and Clara F. Shoemaker. 'This writ of attachment was duly issued and xvas levied by the sheriff upon a Smtih Premier Typewriter, as the…
Read the full summary
Appeal from Circuit Court of Jackson. Tried before the Hon. J. A. Bilrro. This was a statutory trial of the right of property between F. A. Bostick, as plaintiff, and the Brandon Printing Company as claimant; and was instituted ixi the following manner: F. A. Bostick commenced a suit by attachment against J. W. Shoemaker, Lisle Shoemaker and Clara F. Shoemaker. 'This writ of attachment was duly issued and xvas levied by the sheriff upon a Smtih Premier Typewriter, as the property of J. W. Shoemaker. Thereupon the Bi’andon Printing Company made an affidavit and bond and interposed a claim to…
1Opinion of the CourtHaralson, J.
It is not pretended that the contract for the conditional sale of the property,.the subject of this suit, was recorded within thirty days after it Avas brought to Scottsboro, Jackson county. The contract was dated, Scottsboro, Aug. 5th, 1898, was received by the defendant in attachment on the following day, the ■6th, in Scottsboro, where the purchaser resided, having been shipped to him from Nashville on the 5th. If the sale and delivery of it were made in Jackson county, it is conceded that the vendors, not having recorded their contract as required by section 1017 of the Code, within thirty…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Pilgreen v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1882
- Robinson & Ledyard v. Pogue & SonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1888
- Jones & Co. v. BrewerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1885
3Cited by11 opinions
- Fry Bros. v. TheoboldCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1924
- Pulaski Mule Co. v. Haley & KoonceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1914
- Zimmern v. Standard Motor Car Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1921
- In re Dancy Hardware & Furniture Co.District Court, N.D. Alabama · 1912
- Cable Co. of Alabama v. StewartCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1911
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.