Legal Opinion · Dissent

Crum v. Sachs Electric

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided March 7, 1989No. WD 40485Published

1DissentNugent, Judge

I respectfully dissent.

The factual issue in this case is whether Harley Crum, who had the burden of proof, established by competent and substantial evidence his right to an award of permanent and total disability.

Ordinarily, in a workers’ compensation case the appellate court must affirm an award of the Labor and Industrial Rela*134tions Commission if it is supported by competent and substantial evidence based on the record as a whole. But where the facts are not disputed, the award that ought to be made becomes a question of law, and the commission’s ruling is not binding on the appellate court.…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Wolfgeher v. Wagner Cartage Service, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1983
  2. Merriman v. Ben Gutman Truck Service, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1965
  3. Missouri Church of Scientology v. State Tax CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 1977
  4. Davies v. Carter Carburetor, Division ACF Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1968
  5. Groce v. PyleMissouri Court of Appeals · 1958

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API