Snyder v. Federal-Mogul Corp.
District Court, M.D. Florida
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
WM. TERRELL HODGES, District Judge.
Plaintiff Franklin D. Snyder is a beneficiary and participant in a retiree medical benefit plan administered by Defendant Federal-Mogul Corporation. Snyder alleges that Federal-Mogul violated his rights under the Employee Retirement Security Act of 1974, 29 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. (“ERISA”) when Federal-Mogul unilaterally modified his medical benefits. The changes increased the annual deductible and the minimum co-pay for prescription *1255drugs, and eliminated dental and vision coverage (Doc. 1). Snyder seeks judicial review pursuant to 29 U.S.C. §…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Larry Bonner v. City of Prichard, AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1981
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Shaw v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Pilot Life Insurance v. DedeauxSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Varity Corp. v. HoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Turner v. Allstate Insurance Company (LEAD CASE)District Court, M.D. Alabama · 2020