Legal Opinion

United States v. DeOliveira

U.S. Army Court of Military Review

Decided April 28, 1978No. SPCM 13140PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINIÓN OF THE COURT

DeFORD, Judge:

The appellant, pursuant to his pleas, was convicted of absence without leave (2 specifications) in violation of Article 86, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), 10 U.S.C. § 886, by a military judge sitting as a special court-martial. He received an approved sentence that included a bad-conduct discharge, ten days confinement at hard labor, and forfeiture of $75.00 per month for three months.

On appeal, appellant contends that the trial court committed error in admitting into evidence a summary court-martial conviction and three non-judicial punishments…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Stovall v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Linkletter v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. United States v. BookerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1977
  4. United States v. BurrellU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1978
  5. United States v. MartinU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1978

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. BoganU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1982
  2. United States v. GouldU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1982
  3. United States v. LongtinU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1979
  4. United States v. CrumbU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API