Schroeder's Syndics v. Nicholson
Supreme Court of Louisiana
APPEAL PROM THE COURT OP THE FIRST DISTRICT. The cessio bonorum of the insolvents was accepted on the 11th December, 1829. At a meeting of the creditors, legally convoked, on the 19th January following, syndics were appointed; the proceedings before the Notary returned into court, and homologated on the 29th January, 1830. Fending these proceedings, to-wit: on the 19th January, 1830, suit was commenced against the insolvents, in the District Court of the United States, for…
Read the full summary
APPEAL PROM THE COURT OP THE FIRST DISTRICT. The cessio bonorum of the insolvents was accepted on the 11th December, 1829. At a meeting of the creditors, legally convoked, on the 19th January following, syndics were appointed; the proceedings before the Notary returned into court, and homologated on the 29th January, 1830. Fending these proceedings, to-wit: on the 19th January, 1830, suit was commenced against the insolvents, in the District Court of the United States, for the Eastern District of Louisiana, by C. and J. D. Wolf, citizens of the State of New York, and judgment rendered in…
1Opinion of the Court
Porter, .1.,
delivered the opinion of the court.
The insolvents made a surrender of their property, to their creditors, under the laws of this State, on the 11th December, 1829. On the same day, the cession was accepted by the judge. On the 19th January, of the following year, a meeting of~ the creditors was called before a Notary, who assented to the prayer of the petitioners; accepted the cession of their goods and effects, and appointed syndics. On the 29th of this month, the proceedings of *352the creditors were returned into court, and by its judgment expressly homologated.
Between the period…
2Cited by4 opinions
- Equitable Real Estate Co. v. National Surety Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1913
- Seal v. GanoSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1926
- Hayden v. Yale & BowlingSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1893
- Dupuy v. BemissSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1847