United States v. Carl Fiorito, United States of America v. Theodore De Rose
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
CASTLE, Circuit Judge.
The defendants, Carl Fiorito and Theodore DeRose, were convicted, following a jury trial, on a two-count indictment charging each with violations of 26 U.S. C.A. § 4705(a) and 21 U.S.C.A. § 174. Fiorito was sentenced to a term of twenty yeai’S on each count, the sentences to run concurrently. DeRose was sentenced to concurrent ten year terms. Each of the defendants appealed.
Both appeals present claims by the respective defendant of reversible error arising from statements made by the trial judge to the jury preliminary to the giving of the formal instructions, rulings on…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Lovely v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1948
- State v. MountSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1959
- United States v. William JacksonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1958
- Demetree v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1953
- United States v. Fred Coduto, Howard Frye and Coyit BakerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1961
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- People v. MorseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
- Commonwealth v. WalkerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
- United States v. Jaime L. FerraCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
- United States v. BakerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- Charles Thomas Corn, Cross-Appellant v. Walter Zant, Warden, Jackson Diagnostic and Classification Center, Respondent- Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1983
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.