Legal Opinion

Medel v. Valentine

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided September 27, 1979No. Nos. 54984, 55202PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SUNDBERG, Justice.

We decide in this appeal whether the benefits of the Medical Mediation Act1 may be afforded a codefendant joined subsequent to the effective date of the Act, but denied to the original defendant against whom suit was filed prior to the Act’s effective date. Because the Circuit Court of Dade County held the Medical Mediation statute unconstitutional as applied to Dr. Valentine, we have jurisdiction over that order as well as over all other issues properly preserved for appeal. Art. V, § 3(b)(1), Fla.Const.; Allen v. State, 326 So.2d 419 (Fla.1975); P. C. Lissenden Co. v.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. PC Lissenden Co. v. Board of County Commissioners of Palm Beach CountySupreme Court of Florida · 1959
  2. MOUNT SINAI HOSP. OF GREATER MIAMI, INC. v. MoraDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1977
  3. Allen v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1975
  4. Fisher v. HerreraSupreme Court of Florida · 1978
  5. O'Grady v. WhiteDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1977

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hickox v. University Community Hospital, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
  2. Theodorou v. BurlingDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
  3. Bethesda Radiology Associates, P.A. v. YaffeeDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API