Legal Opinion

Nemec v. Deering

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided June 6, 1984No. 14389Published

1Opinion of the Court

350 N.W.2d 53 (1984)

Jerry NEMEC, Plaintiff and Appellant,

v.

Harold H. DEERING, Defendant and Appellee.

No. 14389.

Supreme Court of South Dakota.

Argued March 21, 1984.

Decided June 6, 1984.

Ramon A. Roubideaux, Rapid City, for plaintiff and appellant.

Joseph H. Barnett of Siegel, Barnett & Schutz, Aberdeen, for defendant and appellee.

RAMYNKE, Circuit Judge.

Jerry Nemec (Nemec) brought this action against attorney Harold Deering (Deering) alleging that Deering was negligent and breached his contract to represent Nemec in an action brought by Texaco Corporation (Texaco) against Nemec. The circuit court…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Wilson v. Great Northern Railway CompanySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Woodruff v. TomlinCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1980
  3. Harding v. BellOregon Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Lewandowski v. Continental Casualty Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Caneva v. Miners and Merchants BankSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API