Legal Opinion

Schaefer v. Kienzel

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided January 20, 1888PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Writ of Error to the Circuit Court of St. Clair county; the Hon. W. H. Snyder, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Sheldon

This was a bill for the partition of a town lot in the town of West Belleville, brought by Ernestine Kienzel, the daughter and heir-at-law of Gottfried Taubert, deceased, against Justine Taubert, the widow, and Paulina Schaefer, the other daughter and remaining heir-at-law of said Gottfried. There was a decree in accordance with the prayer of the bill. Paulina Schaefer brings the case here on error, and makes the following assignments of error:

First—That Paulina Schaefer had not been served with notice, as required by law. It appears from the printer’s certificate, that the first publication…

2Cited by10 opinions

  1. Meldrum v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1907
  2. Cox v. SternIllinois Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Funk v. BakerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
  4. Millis v. MillisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1927
  5. Hertig v. People ex rel. KocherspergerIllinois Supreme Court · 1896

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API