Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Behrendt v. Gulf Underwriters Insurance

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided July 9, 2009No. 2006AP2910Published

1ConcurrencePatience Drake Roggensack, J.

¶ 88. (concurring). I concur in the result reached by the majority opinion in regard to both claims made. I write only with regard to the negligence claim in order to point out the difficulty in assessing duty, and the scope of duty, under our negligence jurisprudence. Some of the difficulty is caused in part by our failing to be precise in our reasoning when a claim of negligence arises from an allegation of a failure to act, as distinguished from a claim asserting that the act in question was negligently performed. This difficulty is enhanced when the claim made could be characterized as…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Palsgraf v. Long Island R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
  2. Coffey v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
  3. A. E. Investment Corp. v. Link Builders, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Rockweit v. SenecalWisconsin Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Pfeifer v. Standard Gateway Theater, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1952

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API