Legal Opinion

In re Mays

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided January 26, 1998No. S98Y0455PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

The State Bar filed a complaint against W. Roy Mays III, alleging his violation of the following standards of Bar Rule 4-102: Standard 31 (d) (failure to provide written statement upon the conclusion of a contingency matter); Standard 45 (e) (knowingly engaging in illegal conduct or conduct contrary to a disciplinary rule); Standard 45 (f) (settling a matter without client authorization); Standard 63 (failure to keep complete records); Standard 65 (A) (commingling lawyer’s fund with his client’s); and Standard 68 (failure to respond to disciplinary authorities). Although Mays failed to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In the Matter of Alan ManheimSupreme Court of Georgia · 1990
  2. In re WeinerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1991
  3. In re McDonaldSupreme Court of Georgia · 1995

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In Re ShehaneSupreme Court of Georgia · 2003
  2. Matter of FriedmanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1998
  3. In the Matter of Michael Anthony EddingsSupreme Court of Georgia · 2022
  4. Inquiry Concerning Judge Christian CoomerSupreme Court of Georgia · 2023
  5. In re MeyersSupreme Court of Georgia · 2017

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API