Legal Opinion

Capital One Bank v. Commissioner of Revenue

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided January 8, 2009PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSpina, J.

The present appeal is from a decision of the Appellate Tax Board (board) affirming the denial by the Commissioner of Revenue (commissioner) of applications by the taxpayers, Capital One Bank (Capital One) and Capital One F.S.B. (FSB) (collectively, Capital banks), for the abatement of financial institution excises (FIET).2 Capital One sought abatement for the tax years 1995 through 1998, and FSB sought abatement for the tax years 1996 through 1998. At issue is whether, consistent with the Federal commerce clause of the United States Constitution art. 1, § 8, the Commonwealth can impose the…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Complete Auto Transit, Inc. v. BradySupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. Quill Corp. v. North Dakota Ex Rel. HeitkampSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. Oklahoma Tax Commission v. Jefferson Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
  4. Freeman v. HewitSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  5. Commonwealth Edison Co. v. MontanaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. KFC Corporation Vs. Iowa Department Of RevenueSupreme Court of Iowa · 2010
  2. Crutchfield Corp. v. Testa (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2016
  3. Alliance to Protect Nantucket Sound, Inc. v. Department of Public UtilitiesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2011
  4. Schussel v. Commissioner of RevenueMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2015
  5. Genentech, Inc. v. Commissioner of RevenueMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2017

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API