Legal Opinion · Dissent

Berghahn v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided September 19, 1984No. 125-84Published

1DissentClinton, Judge

Our present code of criminal procedure provides, and probably all its predecessors did as well, that a verdict is “a written declaration by a jury of its decision of the issue submitted to it ...,” Article 37.01, Y.A.C.C.P. The codes have also recognized a possibility that a jury verdict may be informal, meaning the jury had not “reduced [it] to the proper form,” Article 37.-10, id. A means of correcting an informal verdict is indicated, ibid.

Yet, the Legislature has never seen fit to prescribe a mechanism for the jury to reduce its declaration to writing in the proper form. Consequently,…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Woodall v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1910
  2. Oates v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1907
  3. Hickox v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1923
  4. Buster v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1874
  5. Bolden v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1972

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API