Berghahn v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1DissentClinton, Judge
Our present code of criminal procedure provides, and probably all its predecessors did as well, that a verdict is “a written declaration by a jury of its decision of the issue submitted to it ...,” Article 37.01, Y.A.C.C.P. The codes have also recognized a possibility that a jury verdict may be informal, meaning the jury had not “reduced [it] to the proper form,” Article 37.-10, id. A means of correcting an informal verdict is indicated, ibid.
Yet, the Legislature has never seen fit to prescribe a mechanism for the jury to reduce its declaration to writing in the proper form. Consequently,…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Woodall v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1910
- Oates v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1907
- Hickox v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1923
- Buster v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1874
- Bolden v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1972
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.