Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Holliday v. King

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided January 29, 1903No. 4,286PublishedCited by 2 opinions

From Tippecanoe Superior Court; W. D. Wallace, Judge. Action "by the State on the relation of Sarah Holliday against George B. King, as sheriff of Tippecanoe county, and others. From a judgment for defendants, plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtRobinson, J.

Suit against appellee King, as sheriff, and his bondsmen, to recover money alleged to have been received for the use of relatrix. The complaint filed December 8, 1899, avers that theretofore one Lucas began foreclosure proceedings against relatrix and her husband to collect a debt owing by her husband and foreclose a mortgage on lands owned by her husband," in which mortgage she had joined. William Y. Stuart and William F. Bartmess each held a personal judgment against the husband, and were made parties. The only process upon relatrix was the original summons issued at the instance of Lucas.…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Buck v. ColbathSupreme Court of the United States · 1866
  2. Savacool v. BoughtonNew York Supreme Court · 1830
  3. Allyn v. MatherSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1832
  4. Erskine v. HohnbachSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
  5. Sandford v. NicholsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1816

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Board of Education of Nebo School Dist. v. JeppsonUtah Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Sanders v. WaghalterCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1917

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API