Legal Opinion
United States of America, Cross-Appellee v. Hayter Oil Company, Inc. Of Greeneville, Tennessee, D/B/A Marsh Petroleum Company, and Sonny Wayne Marsh
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided April 17, 1995No. 94-5670, 94-5712 and 94-5713PublishedCited by 55 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MILBURN, Circuit Judge.
In this case of first impression, the United States of America appeals the sentences imposed on defendant Hayter Oil Co., Inc. and defendant Sonny Wayne Marsh following their jury convictions for conspiracy to fix gasoline prices in violation of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1. Defendants cross-appeal the underlying jury convictions. On appeal, the issues are (1) whether the district court erroneously interpreted the Antitrust Guideline, United States Sentencing Guideline (“U.S.S.G.”) § 2R1.1, and (2) whether the evidence was sufficient to prove that defendants were…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Pinkerton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- United States v. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Stinson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by55 opinions
- McPherson v. KelseyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
- Mcpherson v. KelseyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
- United States v. John D. RogersCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
- United States v. David J. FarrowCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
- United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Michael D. Andreas and Terrance S. Wilson, Defendants-Appellants/cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.