Legal Opinion

Orr Felt Co. v. City of Piqua

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided January 5, 1983No. 81-1824PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

The issue presented in this case is whether appellant class is entitled to a refund by appellee of alleged overcharges in electric rates. Appellant’s argument is essentially twofold. First, it asserts that appellee set base rates which were too low to recover the costs of operation of the municipal power facility, ostensibly to impress local voters with the economy of their administration, and then billed for fuel adjustment charges which were excessive in order to recover costs. The fuel adjustment figures were, appellant argues, arbitrarily selected by appellee without relation to the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Board of Education of City School District v. City of ColumbusOhio Supreme Court · 1928
  2. City of Niles v. Union Ice Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1938
  3. State Ex Rel. Mt. Sinai Hospital v. HickeyOhio Supreme Court · 1940

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Toledo Edison Co. v. City of BryanOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Toledo Edison Co. v. BryanOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Yoby v. ClevelandOhio Court of Appeals · 2020
  4. Fairway Manor, Inc. v. City of AkronOhio Court of Appeals · 1983
  5. Village of Plymouth v. City of WillardOhio Court of Appeals · 1988

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API