Legal Opinion

In Re McMullen

United States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. Illinois

Decided February 4, 2001No. 19-80224PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

THOMAS L. PERKINS, Bankruptcy Judge.

The issue before the Court concerns the reasonableness of a creditor’s flat rate attorney fees and costs, that are to be paid through a Chapter 13 plan to cure a mortgage default. At the scheduled evidentia-ry hearing, both the Debtor and the creditor chose not to present any evidence and jointly requested that the Court decide the issue based solely on the information contained in the court file.

The DEBTOR, Kevin Leroy McMullen (“DEBTOR”), resides at 1020 Lincoln Road, Marquette Heights, Illinois. Fairbanks Capital Corporation (“FAIRBANKS”), holds a…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Rake v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. J.B. Esker & Sons, Inc. v. Cle-Pa's PartnershipAppellate Court of Illinois · 2001
  3. Chicago Title & Trust Co. v. Chicago Title & Trust Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1993
  4. First Fed. Sav. Bank of Proviso Township v. Drovers Nat. BankAppellate Court of Illinois · 1992
  5. Selvy v. BeigelAppellate Court of Illinois · 1999

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Atwood v. Chase Manhattan Mortgage Co. (In Re Atwood)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  2. Padilla v. GMAC Mortgage Corp. (In Re Padilla)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2008
  3. In Re PlantUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 2003
  4. Powe v. Chrysler Financial Corp. (In Re Powe)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Alabama · 2002
  5. In Re BoydUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Jersey · 2008

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API